Member Login
Join Now
Toggle navigation
Home
About Us
About ESANZ
Directors
Committee Leads
Affiliated Societies
Governance and Constitution
FAQ
Become a Member
Committees
Sonographer
Sonographer Committee
Sonographer Resources
Intensive Care
ICU Committee
ICU Resources
Intraoperative
Intraoperative Committee
Intraoperative Resources
Structural
Structural Echo Committee
Structural Echo Resources
POCUS
POCUS Committee
POCUS Resources
Paediatrics
Paediatrics Committee
Paediatrics Resources
ACHD
ACHD Committee
ACHD Resources
ICE
Research
Resources
All Resources
News Feed
Educational Blogs
Educational Videos
Image Library
One Clip Challenge
On-demand Webinars
Guideline resources
Standards
Meetings/Events
ESANZ Launch Webinar
EVENT Calendar
Echo Australia 2026
On-Demand Webinars
Contact Us
Reach out to ESANZ
Industry partners
CPD Questions (5-question approach for echo of undifferentiated shock)
Name:
First Name:
Last Name:
Contact Email:
Submission date:
I confirm that I have watched the accompanying video in full before completing these CPD questions and claiming CPD points.:
Yes
A 72-year-old patient with septic shock undergoes echocardiographic assessment with the findings as below. Which of the following is the most appropriate interpretation?:
A. Normal stroke volume and normal cardiac output
B. Low stroke volume with critically low cardiac output
C. Low cardiac output despite preserved stroke volume
D. Cardiac output preserved despite low stroke volume, in the context of tachycardia
E. Hyperdynamic cardiac output due to distributive shock
Stroke volume index of 27 mL/m², cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m² and a heart rate of 108 bpm.
2. Which of the following best describes the recommended role of echocardiography in undifferentiated shock?:
A. Establish whether hypotension is present
B. Should only be performed by critically trained sonographers
C. Replace invasive haemodynamic assessment
D. Determine the single predominant mechanism of shock
E. Identify and quantify potentially coexisting mechanisms contributing to shock
3. A patient with septic shock is tachycardic with a small hyperdynamic LV. Which additional abnormality should be specifically sought in all shocked patients, according to the authors?:
A. Mid-cavity obliteration only if hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is known
B. Pulmonary vein systolic flow reversal
C. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
D. Left atrial appendage thrombus
E. Aortic pressure recovery
4. A mechanically ventilated patient with septic shock has an average E/e prime of 16. Which interpretation is most appropriate?:
A. LAP must be normal because the patient is ventilated
B. E/e prime (E/e') cannot be used in critically ill patients
C. This confirms an elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
D. This provides evidence supporting elevated LAP but should be integrated with other findings
E. The result indicates impaired LV relaxation but provides no information regarding LAP
5. A patient in shock has severe RV systolic dysfunction and severe tricuspid regurgitation. TR Vmax is only 2.7 m/s. Which conclusion is most appropriate?:
A. Pulmonary hypertension is excluded
B. Pulmonary vascular resistance must be normal
C. PASP can be calculated accurately using the standard Bernoulli equation
D. The low TR velocity confirms isolated RV infarction
E. Significant pulmonary hypertension may still be present despite the relatively low TR velocity
6. A shocked patient has a measurable TR Vmax of 4.2 m/s. What does this finding particularly suggest?:
A. Acute hypovolaemia
B. Acute pulmonary embolism is the only likely diagnosis
C. Normal pulmonary vascular resistance with increased cardiac output
D. Pulmonary vascular resistance is likely to have been chronically elevated
E. Severe TR must be present
7. In a shocked patient, pulmonary artery acceleration time (PAAT) is 88 ms. Which interpretation is most appropriate?:
A. This excludes elevated PVR
B. This confirms acute pulmonary embolism
C. This indicates elevated LAP
D. This confirms chronic pulmonary hypertension regardless of heart rate
E. This supports elevated PVR when concordant with other findings
8. A patient with haemorrhagic shock has a markedly dilated left atrium but other findings suggest very low preload. Which is the best explanation?:
A. Chronic LA enlargement may persist despite an acute fall in preload and LAP
B. The LA measurement is unreliable during shock
C. LA enlargement indicates acute volume overload
D. A dilated LA excludes hypovolaemia
E. The patient must have elevated LAP
9. A patient with septic shock initially demonstrates a small underfilled LV. Following fluid resuscitation, repeat echocardiography shows a hyperdynamic LV with preserved cardiac output but ongoing shock. What principle does this best illustrate?:
A. Septic shock is exclusively distributive
B. Hyperdynamic LV function excludes ongoing shock
C. The initial echocardiogram was technically incorrect
D. Serial echocardiography is unnecessary once cardiac output normalises
E. The relative contributions of different shock mechanisms can change during the course of critical illness
10. A patient develops new severe LV systolic dysfunction during septic shock. Cardiac function improves clinically after recovery. According to the authors proposed approach, which strategy is most appropriate?:
A. No further imaging is required if blood pressure normalises
B. Repeat echocardiography before discharge only if LVEF was <20%
C. Perform an echocardiogram after resolution of the acute illness
D. Repeat echocardiography only if symptoms recur
E. Perform coronary angiography in all cases
Email Address
Quick Links
Home
About ESANZ
Directors
Committee Leads
Affiliated Societies
FAQ
Membership Benefits
Become a Member
Member Login
Committees
Sonographer
Intensive Care
Intra-operative
Structural
POCUS
Paediatrics
ACHD
ICE
Research
Resources
All Resources
News Feed
Educational Blogs
Educational videos
Image Library
One Clip Challenge
Guideline resources
Standards
Meetings/Events
ESANZ Launch Webinar
Event Calendar
Echo Australia 2026
On-Demand Webinars
Contact Us
Reach out to ESANZ
Industry partners
Follow Us
Linkedin